Ex-Uber Security Employees Allege Practices

Uber’s security group are guaranteeing in court that the organization is endeavoring to square them from unveiling “various profoundly disturbing practices at Uber that have not been openly uncovered.”

The ex-workers didn’t substantiate their case in a documenting Friday in state court in San Francisco. They were reacting to a week ago’s grievance by the ride-hailing monster blaming them for inappropriately taking secret records when they cleared out the organization and utilizing the data to draft their own claim against Uber.

The four – Mat Henley, Nicholas Gicinto, Edward Russo and Jacob Nocon – said in the documenting that they have proof of “conceivably criminal activities against contenders, mystery abilities installed in Uber’s cell phone applications, and hostile interruptions into the protection of clients.”

“We don’t protest these previous workers making any cases they wish,” Uber representative Matt Kallman said in a messaged explanation. “What we do protest is their strolling off with organization property and their abuse of advantaged data for individual gain.”

The legitimate filings are a piece of the wide-achieving aftermath from Waymo’s claim charging that Uber stole its competitive advantages for self-driving vehicles – which the organizations settled for the current year amidst a preliminary.

Amid the Waymo case, a previous partner of the four men, Richard Jacobs, took the testimony box to detail allegations he had displayed to government examiners that the organization’s security unit occupied with flawed corporate reconnaissance strategies and illicit exercises. Henley, Gicinto, Russo and Nocon later sued Jacobs for slander, asserting his cases were false.

The four battle Uber neglected to shield their notorieties for being well as rehashed a portion of Jacobs’ false articulations. They’ve drafted an objection against the organization for criticism and illegitimate end, as indicated by Friday’s recording.


About the author


Leave a Comment